DBMS > Altibase vs. H2

System Properties Comparison Altibase vs. H2

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare Altibase and H2 with Microsoft SQL Server, PostgreSQL and RocksDB.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

An enterprise grade, high-performance RDBMS

Full-featured RDBMS with a small footprint, either embedded into a Java application or used as a database server.

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Secondary database models

Spatial DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	1.41
Rank	#173	Overall
	#85	Relational DBMS

Score	8.30
Rank	#54	Overall
	#32	Relational DBMS

Website

altibase.com

www.h2database.com

Technical documentation

github.com/ALTIBASE/Documents/tree/master/Manuals

www.h2database.com/html/main.html

Developer

Altibase

Thomas Mueller

Initial release

1999

2005

Current release

v7.1.0.5.3, March 2021

2.1.210, January 2022

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

since February 2018

Open Source

dual-licence (Mozilla public license, Eclipse public license)

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++

Java

Server operating systems

AIX
HP-UX
Linux

All OS with a Java VM

Data scheme

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

ANSI SQL-92

yes

APIs and other access methods

JDBC
ODBC
Proprietary protocol

JDBC
ODBC

Supported programming languages

C
C++
Java

Java

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

stored procedures and stored functions

Java Stored Procedures and User-Defined Functions

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Sharding

none

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

yes

With clustering: 2 database servers on different computers operate on identical copies of a database

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

yes, multi-version concurrency control (MVCC)

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

fine grained access rights according to SQL-standard

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

Global Relational In-Memory Database Market Analysis, Revenue, Size, Price, Market Share, Growth Rate, Forecas
18 January 2023, openPR

In-Memory Database Market Business Growth 2023 [Latest Report ...
16 January 2023, Digital Journal

In-Memory Analytics Tools Market is Surpassing US$ 8.09 Billion by 2032 | Report by Future Market Insights, In
19 January 2023, openPR

Daegu Government Integrated Data Center to Propose Open ...
14 April 2021, Etnews

In-memory Database Market to Reach $30.4 Billion, Globally, by ...
7 November 2022, PR Newswire

provided by Google News

Share this page