DBMS > AlaSQL vs. HugeGraph

System Properties Comparison AlaSQL vs. HugeGraph

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare AlaSQL and HugeGraph with SQLite, MongoDB and MySQL.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

JavaScript DBMS library

A fast-speed and highly-scalable Graph DBMS

Primary database model

Document store
Relational DBMS

Graph DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	0.69
Rank	#245	Overall
	#36	Document stores
	#113	Relational DBMS

Score	0.46
Rank	#282	Overall
	#22	Graph DBMS

Website

alasql.org

github.com/hugegraph

Technical documentation

github.com/agershun/alasql

hugegraph.github.io/hugegraph-doc

Developer

Andrey Gershun & Mathias R. Wulff

Baidu

Initial release

2014

2018

Current release

0.9

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source

MIT-License

Open Source

Apache Version 2.0

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

JavaScript

Java

Server operating systems

server-less, requires a JavaScript environment (browser, Node.js)

Linux
macOS
Unix

Data scheme

schema-free

yes

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

also supports composite index and range index

SQL

Support of SQL

Close to SQL99, but no user access control, stored procedures and host language bindings.

APIs and other access methods

JavaScript API

Java API
RESTful HTTP API
TinkerPop Gremlin

Supported programming languages

JavaScript

Groovy
Java
Python

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

asynchronous Gremlin script jobs

Triggers

yes

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

yes

depending on used storage backend, e.g. Cassandra and HBase

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

none

yes

depending on used storage backend, e.g. Cassandra and HBase

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

via hugegraph-spark

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

none

Eventual Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

edges in graph

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

yes

only for local storage and DOM-storage

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

by using IndexedDB, SQL.JS or proprietary FileStorage

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Users, roles and permissions

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

Recent citations in the news

HarperDB - How and Why We Built It From The Ground Up on NodeJS
28 February 2021, hackernoon.com

NoSQL in the Enterprise
21 April 2010, InfoQ.com

provided by Google News

Share this page