DBMS > AlaSQL vs. Drizzle vs. Hyprcubd
System Properties Comparison AlaSQL vs. Drizzle vs. Hyprcubd
Please select another system to include it in the comparison.
|Editorial information provided by DB-Engines|
|Name||AlaSQL Xexclude from comparison||Drizzle Xexclude from comparison||Hyprcubd Xexclude from comparison|
|Drizzle has published its last release in September 2012. The open-source project is discontinued and Drizzle is excluded from the DB-Engines ranking.||Hyprcubd seems to be discontinued. Therefore it is excluded from the DB-Engines ranking.|
|Primary database model||Document store|
|Relational DBMS||Time Series DBMS|
|Developer||Andrey Gershun & Mathias R. Wulff||Drizzle project, originally started by Brian Aker||Hyprcubd, Inc.|
|Current release||7.2.4, September 2012|
|License Commercial or Open Source||Open Source MIT-License||Open Source GNU GPL||commercial|
|Cloud-based only Only available as a cloud service||no||no||yes|
|DBaaS offerings (sponsored links) Database as a Service|
Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.
|Typing predefined data types such as float or date||no||yes||yes time, int, uint, float, string|
|XML support Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.||no||no|
|SQL Support of SQL||Close to SQL99, but no user access control, stored procedures and host language bindings.||yes with proprietary extensions||SQL-like query language|
|Server-side scripts Stored procedures||no||no||no|
|Triggers||yes||no hooks for callbacks inside the server can be used.||no|
|Partitioning methods Methods for storing different data on different nodes||none||Sharding|
|Replication methods Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes||none||Multi-source replication|
|MapReduce Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods||no||no||no|
|Consistency concepts Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system||none||Eventual Consistency|
|Foreign keys Referential integrity||yes||yes||no|
|Transaction concepts Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data||yes only for local storage and DOM-storage||ACID||no|
|Concurrency Support for concurrent manipulation of data||yes||no|
|Durability Support for making data persistent||yes by using IndexedDB, SQL.JS or proprietary FileStorage||yes||yes|
|In-memory capabilities Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.||yes||no|
|User concepts Access control||no||Pluggable authentication mechanisms e.g. LDAP, HTTP||token access|
More information provided by the system vendor
We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
Related products and services
We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.
|DB-Engines blog posts|
MySQL won the April ranking; did its forks follow? Has MySQL finally lost its mojo?
Has MySQL finally lost its mojo?
|Recent citations in the news|
HarperDB - How and Why We Built It From The Ground Up on NodeJS
NoSQL in the Enterprise
provided by Google News
Why an interactive digital business card could replace LinkedIn for ...
Sewing Labs stitches expanded identity as social media influencer ...
KC's favorite BBQ: Interest in these 10 restaurants surged with ...
How To See In Four Dimensions - Slashdot
provided by Google News
Share this page