DBMS > Aerospike vs. AnzoGraph DB

System Properties Comparison Aerospike vs. AnzoGraph DB

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Our visitors often compare Aerospike and AnzoGraph DB with Neo4j, GraphDB and Redis.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Description

Real-time database for speed, scale, and savings. Millisecond latency for mixed read/write workloads. Highly distributed. Proven strong consistency. Distributed ACID Transactions. Flash optimized for low cost of ownership and scalability.

Aerospike Database is a shared-nothing, multi-threaded, multi-model data platform designed to operate efficiently on a cluster of server nodes, exploiting modern hardware and network technologies to drive reliably fast performance, at sub-millisecond speeds across petabytes of data.

Scalable graph database built for online analytics and data harmonization with MPP scaling, high-performance analytical algorithms and reasoning, and virtualization

Primary database model

Document store
Graph DBMS

leveraging Apache Tinkerpop
Key-value store
Spatial DBMS
Vector DBMS

Graph DBMS
RDF store

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	5.22
Rank	#60	Overall
	#10	Document stores
	#3	Graph DBMS
	#7	Key-value stores
	#2	Spatial DBMS
	#5	Vector DBMS

Score	0.21
Rank	#308	Overall
	#26	Graph DBMS
	#15	RDF stores

Website

aerospike.com

cambridgesemantics.com/anzograph

Technical documentation

docs.aerospike.com

docs.cambridgesemantics.com/anzograph/userdoc/home.htm

Developer

Aerospike

Cambridge Semantics

Initial release

2012

2018

Current release

8.0, February 2025

2.3, January 2021

License

Commercial or Open Source

Open Source, Commercial

Apache and AGPL Licenses; open sourced in June 2014; commercial Enterprise Edition available

commercial

free trial version available

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Aerospike Cloud: aerospike.com/products/aerospike-cloud

Implementation language

Server operating systems

Linux

Data scheme

schema-free

Schema-free and OWL/RDFS-schema support

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

via Trino Connector or JDBC driver

SPARQL and SPARQL* as primary query language. Cypher preview.

APIs and other access methods

JDBC
Proprietary protocol
REST
TinkerPop Gremlin

Apache Mule
gRPC
JDBC
Kafka
OData access for BI tools
OpenCypher
RESTful HTTP API
SPARQL

Supported programming languages

.Net
C
C# (.NET)
C++
Erlang
Go
Java
JavaScript (Node.js)
Lua
Perl
PHP
Python
Ruby
Rust

C++
Java
Python

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

user defined functions

with Lua

user defined functions and aggregates

Triggers

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

Auto-Sharding

Automatic sharding

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

selectable replication factor

Multi-source replication in MPP-Cluster

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

yes

Aerospike Aggregation Framework is similar to Map/Reduce

Kerberos/HDFS data loading

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Eventual Consistency in cross-datacenter configuration and Immediate Strong Consistency in local cluster configuration. Also supports single cluster deployments with strong consistency across multiple AZs and Regions.

Immediate Consistency in MPP-Cluster

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

not needed in graphs

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

Atomic Distributed ACID transactions execution of operations

ACID

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

LDAP external authentication: aerospike.com/docs/server/operations/configure/security/ldap
Mutual TLS authentication (PKI auth): aerospike.com/docs/server/operations/configure/network/tls
Password authentication: aerospike.com/docs/server/operations/configure/security/access-control
Role-Based Access Control (RBAC): aerospike.com/docs/graph/security/access-control
Access rights for users and roles

with Enterprise Edition only

Access rights for users and roles

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

Evaluating Hbase and Aerospike Solutions for Real-time System of Record
17 March 2020, Srini Srinivasan, Aerospike (sponsor)

show all

Recent citations in the news

Analysts welcome ACID transactions on real-time distributed Aerospike
13 February 2025, The Register

Latest Aerospike database update prioritizes performance
5 February 2025, TechTarget

Aerospike says it has achieved a milestone in NoSQL OLTP performance
5 February 2025, SiliconANGLE News

Aerospike Vector Search adds self-healing live indexes
16 December 2024, InfoWorld

BAE Systems, Aerospike to Advance Real-Time Data Capabilities for US DoD
29 October 2024, The Defense Post

provided by Google News

AnzoGraph: A graph database for deep analytics
15 April 2019, InfoWorld

Cambridge Semantics Fits AnzoGraph DB with More Speed, Free Access
23 January 2020, Solutions Review

Knowledge graph evolution: Platforms that speak your language
30 January 2020, ZDNet

The 12 Best Graph Databases to Consider for 2025
29 March 2021, Solutions Review

provided by Google News

Share this page