DBMS > 4D vs. Drizzle vs. Memgraph

System Properties Comparison 4D vs. Drizzle vs. Memgraph

Please select another system to include it in the comparison.

Editorial information provided by DB-Engines

Name

Drizzle has published its last release in September 2012. The open-source project is discontinued and Drizzle is excluded from the DB-Engines ranking.

Description

Application development environment with integrated database management system

MySQL fork with a pluggable micro-kernel and with an emphasis of performance over compatibility.

A hybrid, in-memory first, distributed graph DBMS delivering high-performance on analytical and transactional workloads at enterprise scale

Primary database model

Relational DBMS

Graph DBMS

DB-Engines Ranking measures the popularity of database management systems
Trend Chart

Score	2.58
Rank	#109	Overall
	#54	Relational DBMS

Score	0.08
Rank	#305	Overall
	#29	Graph DBMS

Website

www.4d.com

memgraph.com

Technical documentation

livedoc.4d.com

docs.memgraph.com

Developer

4D, Inc

Drizzle project, originally started by Brian Aker

Memgraph Ltd

Initial release

1984

2008

2017

Current release

v18.1, March 2020

7.2.4, September 2012

License

Commercial or Open Source

commercial

Open Source

GNU GPL

commercial

Free license available

Cloud-based only

Only available as a cloud service

DBaaS offerings (sponsored links)

Database as a Service

Providers of DBaaS offerings, please contact us to be listed.

Implementation language

C++

C and C++

Server operating systems

OS X
Windows

FreeBSD
Linux
OS X

Linux

Data scheme

yes

schema-free and schema-optional

Typing

predefined data types such as float or date

yes

XML support

Some form of processing data in XML format, e.g. support for XML data structures, and/or support for XPath, XQuery or XSLT.

yes

Secondary indexes

yes

SQL

Support of SQL

yes

close to SQL 92

yes

with proprietary extensions

APIs and other access methods

ODBC
RESTful HTTP API

by using 4D Mobile
SOAP webservices

JDBC

Bolt protocol
Cypher query language

Supported programming languages

4D proprietary IDE
PHP

C
C++
Java
PHP

.Net
C
C++
Elixir
Go
Haskell
Java
JavaScript
PHP
Python
Ruby
Scala

Server-side scripts

Stored procedures

yes

Triggers

yes

hooks for callbacks inside the server can be used.

Partitioning methods

Methods for storing different data on different nodes

none

Sharding

dynamic graph partitioning

Replication methods

Methods for redundantly storing data on multiple nodes

Multi-source replication

Multi-source replication
Source-replica replication

Multi-source replication using RAFT

MapReduce

Offers an API for user-defined Map/Reduce methods

Consistency concepts

Methods to ensure consistency in a distributed system

Immediate Consistency

Foreign keys

Referential integrity

yes

relationships in graphs

Transaction concepts

Support to ensure data integrity after non-atomic manipulations of data

ACID

with snapshot isolation

Concurrency

Support for concurrent manipulation of data

yes

yes, multi-version concurrency control (MVCC)

Durability

Support for making data persistent

yes

with periodic snapshot and write-ahead logging (WAL) of changes

In-memory capabilities

Is there an option to define some or all structures to be held in-memory only.

yes

User concepts

Access control

Users and groups

Pluggable authentication mechanisms

e.g. LDAP, HTTP

Users, roles and permissions

More information provided by the system vendor

We invite representatives of system vendors to contact us for updating and extending the system information,
and for displaying vendor-provided information such as key customers, competitive advantages and market metrics.

Related products and services

We invite representatives of vendors of related products to contact us for presenting information about their offerings here.

More resources

DB-Engines blog posts

MySQL, PostgreSQL and Redis are the winners of the March ranking
2 March 2016, Paul Andlinger

show all

MySQL won the April ranking; did its forks follow?
1 April 2015, Paul Andlinger

Has MySQL finally lost its mojo?
1 July 2013, Matthias Gelbmann

show all

Recent citations in the news

Graph database Market Opportunities, Size, Share, Emerging Trends, Technological Innovation and Forecasts
13 January 2021, MENAFN.COM

Graph database Industry Size 2019, Market Opportunities, Share Analysis up to 20
11 January 2021, Business-newsupdate.com

2021-2025 Graph Database Market | Global Analysis, Modeling, Risk Factors, Growth Strategies, Drivers, Dynamics, Forecast and more | COVID-19 Impact Analysis
13 January 2021, NeighborWebSJ

Graph Database Market , Regional and Global Key Players, Current Size, Forecast and Players Positioning – Memgraph, Cambridge Semantics, Fluree, Blazegraph
28 November 2020, Murphy's Hockey Law

the global graph database market size is projected to grow from USD 1.0 billion in 2019 to USD 2.9 billion by 2024, at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 22.2% during 2019–2024
9 October 2019, GlobeNewswire

provided by Google News

Job opportunities

Cook/Dishwasher
4th dimension fun center, Frederick, MD

Line Cook/Prep Cook
4th dimension fun center, Frederick, MD

Full Charge Bookkeeper
4th Dimension Development, Ferndale, MI

Director, Kapwing for EDU
kapwing, San Francisco, CA

Senior Product Manager
kapwing, San Francisco, CA

jobs by

Share this page